Skip Navigation

Truth, Conservativeness, and Provability

  1. Cezary Cieśliński
  1. University of Warsaw c.cieslinski{at}uw.edu.pl
  1. c.cieslinski{at}uw.edu.pl
  2. mind{at}oxfordjournals.org
  3. mind{at}york.ac.uk

    Abstract

    Conservativeness has been proposed as an important requirement for deflationary truth theories. This in turn gave rise to the so-called ‘conservativeness argument’ against deflationism: a theory of truth which is conservative over its base theory S cannot be adequate, because it cannot prove that all theorems of S are true. In this paper we show that the problems confronting the deflationist are in fact more basic: even the observation that logic is true is beyond his reach. This seems to conflict with the deflationary characterization of the role of the truth predicate in proving generalizations. However, in the final section we propose a way out for the deflationist — a solution that permits him to accept a strong theory, having important truth-theoretical generalizations as its theorems.

        | Table of Contents

        This Article

        1. Mind 119 (474): 409-422. doi: 10.1093/mind/fzq034
        1. All Versions of this Article:
          1. fzq034v1
          2. 119/474/409 most recent

        Classifications

        Share

        1. Email this article

        Published on behalf of

        Editors

        Professor A.W. Moore
        Professor Lucy O’Brien

        For Authors

        Oxford Open

        Looking for your next opportunity?

        Looking for jobs...

        Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.