Russell's Theory of Definite Descriptions
Department of Philosophy, New York University, 503 Silver Center, 100 Washington Square East, New York 10003, USA
The proper statement and assessment of Russell's theory depends on one's semantic presuppositions. A semantic framework is provided, and Russell's theory formulated in terms of it. Referential uses of descriptions raise familiar problems for the theory, to which there are, at the most general level of abstraction, two possible Russellian responses. Both are considered, and both found wanting. The paper ends with a brief consideration of what the correct positive theory of definite descriptions might be, if it is not the Russellian theory.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. S. Amaral Definite descriptions are ambiguous Analysis, October 1, 2008; 68(4): 288 - 297. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
