© 1999 by Mind Association
Logical constants
Department of Philosophy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2. E-mail: warmbro@cc.umanitoba.ca
There is as yet no settled consensus as to what makes a term a logical constant or even as to which terms should be recognized as having this status. This essay sets out and defends a rationale for identifying logical constants. I argue for a two-tiered approach to logical theory. First, a secure, core logical theory recognizes only a minimal set of constants needed for deductively systematizing scientific theories. Second, there are extended logical theories whose objectives are to systematize various pre-theoretic, modal intuitions. The latter theories may recognize a variety of additional constants as needed in order to formalize a given set of intuitions.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Sher The Formal-Structural View Of Logical Consequence Philosophical Review, April 1, 2001; 110(2): 241 - 261. [PDF] |
||||
