© 1998 by Mind Association
Quotation and the use-mention distinction
Department of Philosophy, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Quote marks, I claim, serve to select from the multiple ostensions that are produced whenever any expression is uttered; they act to constrain pragmatic ambiguity or indeterminacy. My argument proceeds by showing that the proffered account fares better than its rivals-the Name, Description, Demonstrative, and Identity Theories. Along the way I shall need to explain and emphasize that quoting is not simply the same thing as mentioning. Quoting, but not mentioning, relies on the use of conventional devices.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. P. Smit and A. Steglich-Petersen Anaphora and Semantic Innocence J Semantics, November 18, 2009; (2009) ffp012v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
